E. Bruce Brooks and A. Taeko Brooks, The Original Analects: Sayings of Confucius and his Successors Reviewed by

Philosophy in Review 21 (2):87-90 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to E. Bruce Brooks and A. Taeko Brooks. [REVIEW]Edward Slingerland - 2000 - Philosophy East and West 50 (1):146 - 147.
Confucius: A Guide for the Perplexed.Yong Huang - 2013 - Bloomsbury Publishing.
Confucius and the Analects: New Essays.Bryan W. Van Norden (ed.) - 2001 - Oxford University Press USA.
Confucius and the analects: New essays. [REVIEW]Sarah A. Queen - 2004 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 31 (4):540–543.
Whose Confucius? Which Analects?Philip J. Ivanhoe - 2002 - In Bryan W. Van Norden (ed.), Confucius and the Analects: New Essays. Oup Usa. pp. 119--33.
Is there a future for AI without representation?Vincent C. Müller - 2007 - Minds and Machines 17 (1):101-115.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-14

Downloads
1 (#1,769,934)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references