In Brian Garvey (ed.), J. L. Austin on Language. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 141–158 (2014)

Roberta Locatelli
University Tübingen
This paper aims to elucidate the significance of Austin’s method of linguistic phenomenology. I will do that by showing how this method operates in Sense and Sensibilia, where, as perception is at issue, the notion of phenomenology seems particularly pertinent. I will argue, against what has been often claimed, that Austin’s method is not merely therapeutical or polemical. In Austin’s view, a careful analysis of ordinary language can sharpen our perception of the world and reveal aspects of the reality itself. If the linguistic analysis aims to get rid of the conceptual distortions entrenched in the philosophical tradition, his appeal to ordinary language is neither quietistic nor resolutive. Ordinary language gives access to a sort of non-introspective intersubjective phenomenology, which may be the foundation of sensible philosophical interrogations and a genuine progress in knowledge. The linguistic analysis held in Sense and Sensibilia illuminates not only the way we talk about experiences, but also the nature and the epistemology of experience itself. These remarks suggest an original way of defending and conceiving naïve realism, whose main elements are a radical externalism, a refusal of the semantization of perception and a dissolution of the skeptical threat. I will suggest that the application of these suggestions, together with the method of linguistic phenomenology, to the current debate on experience, may dissolve the dilemmas which haunt the opposition between conjunctivism and disjunctivism and provide a satisfying account of experience.
Keywords linguistic phenomenology  J.L. Austin  Sense and Sensibilia  Argument from Illusion and Hallucination  Disjunctivism  ordinary language
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Austin on Perception, Knowledge and Meaning.Lawlor Krista - forthcoming - In Savas Tsohatzidis (ed.), Interpreting Austin. Cambridge University Press.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Austin on Sense-Data: Ordinary Language Analysis as 'Therapy'.Eugen Fischer - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):67-99.
Austin and the Argument From Illusion.Roderick Firth - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (July):372-382.
John Langshaw Austin.Federica Berdini, and & Claudia Bianchi - 2013 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Sense and Sensibilia.J. L. AUSTIN - 1962 - Oxford University Press.
Sensible Appearances.Michael G. F. Martin - 2003 - In T. Baldwin (ed.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
The Poetic Experience of the World.Mathew Abbott - 2010 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (4):493-516.
Symposium on J. L. Austin.K. T. Fann - 1969 - New York: Humanities P..
Real.Jonathan Bennett - 1966 - Mind 75 (300):501-515.
Ideal Language Philosophy and Experiments on Intuitions.Sebastian Lutz - 2009 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (2):117-139.
Perceptual Phenomenology and Direct Realism.Caleb Liang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 42:103-148.
Austin's 'Sense and Sensibilia'.Morris Lazerowitz - 1963 - Philosophy 38 (145):242 - 252.


Added to PP index

Total views
694 ( #9,809 of 2,461,463 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
131 ( #4,551 of 2,461,463 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes