Is philosophy useless?

Abstract

This is a discussion piece in a popular philosophy magazine which nevertheless, is a intended as an intellectually serious (albeit stylistically light) work of metaphilosophy. The paper asks reflexive questions about the value of philosophy, addressing these, in the first instance, via the critical, polemical title question.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The relationship between Rawls's ideal theory and the political philosophy.Juan Castro - 2009 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 9:240-270.
Teleosemantics and Useless Content.Andrés L. Jaume - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 42:85-90.
Metaphilosophy as First Philosophy.Robert Piercey - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3):335-349.
Philosophy - A Useless Luxury?David Reiners - 1960 - Philosophy Today 4 (2):75.
On 'Useless' Knowledge.William Tam - 2010 - Philosophy Now 79:19-20.
Our Conception of Competitiveness: Unified but Useless?Todd Jones - 2015 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 42 (3):365-378.
Is it useless to revolt?Michel Foucault & James Bernauer - 1981 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 8 (1):2-4.
Disarming nuclear apologists.Robert E. Goodin - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):153 – 176.
Not Yet. The Philosophical Significance of Aesthetics.Christoph Menke - 2010 - Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 21 (39).
Weak and global supervenience are strong.Mark Moyer - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (1):125 - 150.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-07

Downloads
183 (#104,466)

6 months
28 (#106,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references