The M event paradox and the specious present: An analysis and refutation of Mctaggart's 2nd argument

Analysis and Metaphysics 10:101-112 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Token-based Semantic Analysis of McTaggart's Paradox.Cheng-Chih Tsai - 2011 - Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 10:107-124.
The specious present.J. D. Mabbott - 1955 - Mind 64 (July):376-383.
The Present vs. the Specious Present.Jiri Benovsky - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (2):193-203.
Some metaphysical questions about the doctrine of the 'specious present'.C. T. K. Chari - 1951 - Philosophical Quarterly (India) 23 (October):129-138.
Mc Taggart and the Truth about Time.Heather Dyke - 2002 - In Craig Callender (ed.), Time, Reality and Experience. Cambridge University Press. pp. 137-.
Mctaggart's argument.Denis Corish - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (1):77-99.
The reality of now.William Seager - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):69 – 82.
Farewell to McTaggart’s Argument?Michael Tooley - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (2):243-255.
The pervasive paradox of tense.Heather Dyke - 2001 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):103-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
3 (#1,686,544)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references