Summary of the argument for mental monism

Abstract

1.1 All mental terms are defined by private ostensive definition. 1.1.1 For example, the word "red" used to denote the conscious colour experience of red, as opposed to red light or red paint, is defined by attending to a red sensation and designating it "red"

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Peacocke on red and red.Michael A. Smith - 1986 - Synthese 68 (September):559-576.
Red watermelons and large elephants: A case against compositionality?Mark Siebel - 2000 - Theoria 15 (38):263-280.
Red and 'red'.Galen Strawson - 1989 - Synthese 78 (February):193-232.
Is introspection inferential?Murat Aydede - 2003 - In Brie Gertler (ed.), Privileged Access: Philosophical Accounts of Self-Knowledge. Ashgate.
Looks non-transitive!Philippe Chuard & Richard Corry - manuscript
The Easy Argument.Steven Luper - 2007 - Acta Analytica 22 (4):321 - 331.
Colour for representationalists.Frank Jackson - 2007 - Erkenntnis 66 (1-2):169--85.
18 From the Looks of Things: The Explanatory Failure of Representationalism.Diana Raffman - 2008 - In Edmond L. Wright (ed.), The Case for Qualia. MIT Press. pp. 325.
Davidson’s Argument for Monism.Michael V. Antony - 2003 - Synthese 135 (1):1-12.
A light theory of color.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & David Sparrow - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 110 (3):267-284.
The colors and shapes of visual experiences.David M. Rosenthal - 1999 - In Denis Fisette (ed.), Consciousness and Intentionality: Models and Modalities of Attribution. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 95--118.
Non‐analytic implication.John L. Pollock - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):196 – 203.
Mary Mary, Au Contraire: Reply to Raffman.George Graham & Terence Horgan - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 122 (2):203-212.
Content, Character, and Color Ii: A Better Kind of Representationalism.Sydney Shoemaker - unknown
Why Truthmakers?Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2005 - In Helen Beebee & Julian Dodd (eds.), Truthmakers: the contemporary debate. Oxford University Press. pp. 17-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-10-12

Downloads
40 (#378,975)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references