Not-Quite-So Radical Enactivism

Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):361-363 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Never Mind the Gap: Neurophenomenology, Radical Enactivism, and the Hard Problem of Consciousness” by Michael D. Kirchhoff & Daniel D. Hutto. Upshot: Enactivism is a welcome development in cognitive science, but its “radical” rejection of representation poses problems for capturing phenomenality. The totality of our interactions exceeds our awareness, so circumscribing the activity that constitutes consciousness seems to require representational guidance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Too Often Overlooked Radicality of Neurophenomenology.M. Bitbol & E. Antonova - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):354-356.
Crossing the Explanatory Gap by Legwork, not by Fiat.M. Beaton - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):364-366.
Missing Out On the Radicalism of Neurophenomenology?Katsunori Miyahara - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):368-370.
Identity or Dynamic Structure?S. Gallagher - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):363-364.
Spread Mind and Causal Theories of Content.Krystyna Bielecka - 2014 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies (2):87-97.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-17

Downloads
20 (#747,345)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dan Lloyd
Trinity College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references