The daoist conception of truth: Laozi's metaphysical realism vs. zhuangzi's internal realism

Abstract

In this paper, I shall present a comparative study of two leading Daoists’ different conceptions of truth in the context of modern metaphysical debate on realism and antirealism. My basic contention in this paper is that both Laozi and Zhuangzi embrace the realist's thesis that the world is largely independent of us and the way we are; it has its own objective nature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Habermas between metaphysical and natural realism.Steven Hendley - 2006 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (4):521 – 537.
Internal realism.Brian Ellis - 1988 - Synthese 76 (3):409 - 434.
The Logic of Truth in Paraconsistent Internal Realism.Manuel Bremer - 2008 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 1 (1):76-83.
Putnam, realism and truth.Janet Folina - 1995 - Synthese 103 (2):141--52.
Is Putnam's causal theory of meaning compatible with internal realism?Valer Ambrus - 1999 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 30 (1):1-16.
Realism.Susan Haack - 1987 - Synthese 73 (2):275 - 299.
Horwich on 'semantic' and 'metaphysical' realism.David Davies - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (4):539-557.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
139 (#130,357)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

JeeLoo Liu
California State University, Fullerton

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references