Seriously funny

The Philosophers' Magazine 64:54-59 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter examines the ethics of political comedy as exemplified by The Daily Show, investigating the issue of when, if ever, it is appropriate to use comedy as a political tool. It is argued that mockery may be useful as a way to keep political issues on people's minds, though it becomes dangerous when used as a substitute for reason.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why 30 Rock Is Not Funny.Josh Gillon - 2011 - Philosophy and Literature 35 (2):320-337.
Human constructions.Michael Frayn - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 47 (47):120-126.
Being Funny Is Not that Funny: Contemporary Editorial Cartooning in Iran.Nikahang Kowsar - 2012 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 79 (1):117-144.
The function and content of amusement.Ward E. Jones - 2006 - South African Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):126-137.
Moderate Comic Immoralism and the Genetic Approach to the Ethical Criticism of Art.Ted Nannicelli - 2014 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (2):169-179.
On Humour.Simon Critchley - 2002 - Routledge.
Truly funny: Humor, irony, and satire as moral criticism.E. M. Dadlez - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (1):1-17.
What’s So Funny?[author unknown] - 1999 - Philosophy Now 25:4-4.
Comic Immoralism and Relatively Funny Jokes.Scott Woodcock - 2014 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (2):203-216.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
20 (#749,846)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Greg Littmann
Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references