Justification and the Truth-Connection

New York: Cambridge University Press (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The internalism-externalism debate is one of the oldest debates in epistemology. Internalists assert that the justification of our beliefs can only depend on facts internal to us, while externalists insist that justification can depend on additional, for example environmental, factors. Clayton Littlejohn proposes and defends a new strategy for resolving this debate. Focussing on the connections between practical and theoretical reason, he explores the question of whether the priority of the good to the right might be used to defend an epistemological version of consequentialism, and proceeds to formulate a new 'deontological externalist' view. On this view, the justificatory status of a belief depends upon whether it is fit for the purposes of practical reasoning. Only beliefs that meet externalist standards are fit for such a purpose. If we want to understand how a wide range of norms (e.g., moral norms) apply to rational agents regardless of what their evidence or outlook is like, we have to embrace an externalist account of the justification.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,934

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does Justification Aim at Truth?Peter J. Graham - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):51-72.
Chisholm's Internalism and Its Consequences.Richard Feldman - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (5):603-620.
Is Justification Dialectical?Jan Willem Wieland - 2013 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3 (3):182-201.
The Chimerical Appeal of Epistemic Externalism.Joe Cruz & John Pollock - 2004 - In Richard Schantz (ed.), The Externalist Challenge. De Gruyter. pp. 125--42.
Deontology and defeat.Michael Bergmann - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):87-102.
The Indispensibility of Internalism in Epistemology.Fatih S. M. Ozturk - 2004 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
A Defense of Deontological Externalism.David Dean Reiter - 1993 - Dissertation, The University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Epistemic Internalism.Bjc Madison - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (10):840-853.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-24

Downloads
135 (#101,386)

6 months
6 (#144,789)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Clayton Littlejohn
Australian Catholic University

Citations of this work

The Conflict of Evidence and Coherence.Alex Worsnip - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (1):3-44.
Dilemmic Epistemology.Nick Hughes - 2019 - Synthese 196 (10):4059-4090.
An Epistemic Non-Consequentialism.Kurt L. Sylvan - 2020 - The Philosophical Review 129 (1):1-51.
Accuracy, Coherence and Evidence.Branden Fitelson & Kenny Easwaran - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 5:61-96.

View all 184 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references