A Note Concerning Conciliationism and Self-Defeat: A Reply to Matheson

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a reply to Jon Matheson on conciliationism and the self-defeat objection. I argue that the problems that Matheson discusses derive from his evidentialist assumptions, not from conciliationism.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-20

Downloads
434 (#42,726)

6 months
44 (#86,692)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Clayton Littlejohn
Australian Catholic University

Citations of this work

Akratic (epistemic) modesty.David Christensen - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (7):2191-2214.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Rationality Through Reasoning.John Broome (ed.) - 2013 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Justification and the Truth-Connection.Clayton Littlejohn - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Evidentialism.Richard Feldman & Earl Conee - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 48 (1):15 - 34.
Rationality’s Fixed Point.Michael G. Titelbaum - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 5.

View all 15 references / Add more references