Andrew Lister
Queen's University
There is an odd proximity between Hayek, hero of the libertarian right, and Rawls, theorist of social justice, because, at the level of principle, Hayek was in some important respects a Rawlsian. Although Hayek said that the idea of social justice was nonsense, he argued against only a particular principle of social justice, one that Rawls too rejected, namely distribution according to individual merit. Any attempt to make reward and merit coincide, Hayek argued, would undermine the market's price system, leaving us all poorer and less free. Like Rawls, Hayek held that we should assess social institutions from behind a veil of ignorance, and he thought that doing so pushed us toward egalitarianism. Most of the distance between Hayek and Rawls at the level of policy stems from Hayek's optimism about the operation of markets, his equivocation about the meaning of central concepts, and his appeal to under-argued slippery slopes. Hayek wavered, however, between claiming that private property and markets benefit everyone, compared to the feasible alternatives, and the principle that they maximize the opportunities of a randomly selected member of society, i.e., aggregate opportunity. Contemporary Hayekians claim that capitalism raises the position of the worst off in the long run, in future generations, whereas Rawlsians insist that inequalities between social positions should benefit the worst off now
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/08913811.2013.853859
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mortal Questions.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.

View all 48 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Four Concepts of Rules: A Theory of Rule Egalitarianism.Åsbjørn Melkevik - 2016 - European Journal of Political Theory 18 (4):147488511665336.
Downward Mobility and Rawlsian Justice.Govind Persad - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (2):277-300.
Hayek's Two Epistemologies and the Paradoxes of His Thought.Jeffrey Friedman - 2013 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 25 (3-4):277-304.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Mirage of Social Justice.Friedrich A. von Hayek - 1976 - Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Hayek on Social Justice: Reply to Lukes and Johnston.Edward Feser - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (4):581-606.
Social Justice: The Hayekian Challenge.Steven Lukes - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (1):65-80.
Hayek, Social Justice, and the Market: Reply to Johnston.Edward Feser - 1998 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (3):269-281.
Rawlsian Justice.Fabienne Peter - 2009 - In Paul Anand, Prastanta Pattanaik & Clemens Puppe (eds.), Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford University Press. pp. 433--456.
Hayek's Attack on Social Justice.David Johnston - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (1):81-100.
Is the Idea of Social Justice Meaningful?David Johnston - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (4):607-614.


Added to PP index

Total views
44 ( #248,002 of 2,462,427 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #178,988 of 2,462,427 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes