Replies to Farrell & Tham, and to Fan

In Hon-Lam Li & Michael Campbell (eds.), Public Reason and Bioethics: Three Perspectives. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 135-180 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter, Li argues against the Natural Law Theory approach expounded by Farrell and Tham in Chap. 2. Li also explains why Fan’s version of Confucianism in Chap. 3 is problematic. Li concludes that neither Farrell and Tham, nor Fan, have successfully argued that medical assistance in dying is impermissible.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Replies to Li and Farrell–Tham.Ruiping Fan - 2021 - In Hon-Lam Li & Michael Campbell (eds.), Public Reason and Bioethics: Three Perspectives. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 195-203.
Replies to Li and Fan.Dominic Farrell Lc & Joseph Tham Lc - 2021 - In Hon-Lam Li & Michael Campbell (eds.), Public Reason and Bioethics: Three Perspectives. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 181-194.
Replies To Farrell And Compton.Nick Zangwill - 2008 - American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 1 (1):14-20.
A scriptural way of the cross [Book Review].Marie Farrell - 2012 - The Australasian Catholic Record 89 (1):122.
The Natural Law Tradition, Public Reason, and Bioethics.Dominic Farrell Lc & Joseph Tham Lc - 2021 - In Hon-Lam Li & Michael Campbell (eds.), Public Reason and Bioethics: Three Perspectives. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 59-92.
Mr. Farrell and the refutability of psychoanalysis.Michael Martin - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):80 – 98.
Norms of Rhetorical Culture.Thomas B. Farrell - 1993 - Yale University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-09

Downloads
4 (#1,556,099)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hon-Lam Li
Chinese University of Hong Kong

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references