The Educational Role of Philosophy

Abstract

The history of the relationship between philosophy and education has been a long and troubled one. In part, this stemmed from the problematic nature of philosophy itself, but this difficulty was compounded by controversy as to the age at which training in philosophy should begin. Although Socrates seemed indifferent to whether he conversed philosophically with young or old, his pupil, Plato, was inclined to restrict philosophy to mature students, on the grounds that it made the younger ones unduly contentious. Since philosophers in those days had the reputation of being ‘friends of wisdom,’ and since being a friend of wisdom seemed to require extensive experience, it came to be taken for granted, generation after generation, that philosophy was not for the young. It has sometimes been made available, on a limited basis, at the secondary school level, but almost never to students in the lower grades. To the suggestion that this prevented children from having access to ideas, theories and abstract concepts, the stock response was that children were mired in the ‘concrete’ level of experience and had no interest in abstractions. To the report that very young children almost invariably greeted opportunities to discuss philosophy with joy and delight, the standard reply was that this proved that the children could not be doing philosophy, since the study of philosophy is a serious and difficult matter. The recent career of philosophy in elementary and secondary education has been a matter of overcoming precisely these objection and misconceptions. Unfortunately, a listing of the advantages to be derived by the young from the study of philosophy—its strengthening of reasoning and judgment, its fostering of concept-formation skills, its clarification of values and ideals—is likely to obscure the intrinsic satisfactions that children derive from their classroom communities of philosophical inquiry. But even here there are signs of change, and a new appreciation of the educational possibilities of philosophy is at last beginning to surface in the schools.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,743

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-28

Downloads
43 (#267,544)

6 months
8 (#90,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Experience and Nature.John Dewey - 1958 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 15 (1):98-98.
Toward a Theory of Instruction.Jerome Seymour Bruner - 1966 - Cambridge: Mass., Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Philosophy in the Classroom: 2d Ed.Matthew Lipman - 1977 - Temple University Press.
Philosophy Goes to School.Matthew Lipman - 1988 - Temple University Press.
Experience and Nature.John Dewey - 1928 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 35 (1):10-12.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Similar books and articles

Can Children Do Philosophy?Karin Murris - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 34 (2):261–279.
Can Children Do Philosophy?Karin Murris - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 34 (2):261-279.
Philosophy for Children in Australia: Then, Now, and Where to From Here?Gilbert Burgh & Simone Thornton - 2016 - Re-Engaging with Politics: Re-Imagining the University, 45th Annual Conference of the Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia, ACU, Melbourne, 5-8 Dec 2015.
Philosophy: The Fantom In The Machine.Helena Theodoropoulou - 2006 - Childhood and Philosophy 2 (3):91-114.
The Education of Thinking Course.Nimet Küçük - 2012 - Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children 20 (1-2):69-72.
Philosophy for Children as the Wind of Thinking.Nancy Vansieleghem - 2005 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 39 (1):19–35.
The Subject of Philosophy in Greek Secondary Education.Dimitris Kiritisis - 2014 - Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children 20 (3-4):98-104.