A Normative Theory of Character and the Constituents of Character

Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The central aim of my dissertation is to consider the theoretical basis for the moral evaluation of character and the constituents of character. The latter are simply those traits that we commonly attribute to individuals, such as honesty, cruelty, sympathy, and the like. In general, I contend that an individual's character is to be evaluated by reference to the individual's orientation toward the dignity and well-being of human beings. Character traits that interfere with, impede, or destroy dignity and well-being are vices. Those traits that facilitate or promote dignity and well-being are virtues. Thus, a normative theory of character is an attempt to say which traits taken together will enable individuals to live in such a way as to respect the dignity and promote the well-being of themselves and others. ;In Chapter 1, I detail the complex nature of character traits, and argue that character is a dynamic, projective system of traits which determines how an individual will respond to a given situation. ;In Chapter 2, I briefly consider the moral evaluation of actions, suggesting that actions are to be evaluated by reference to the notions dignity and well-being. The latter is a by-product of the utilization of those physical and psychological capacities that rights protect. ;Chapter 3 aims at showing how traits can be evaluated by reference to the notions of dignity and well-being. I stress that no single virtue, or kind of virtue, is sufficient to guarantee that an individual is properly oriented toward the dignity and well-being of himself and others. Traits vary considerably in the nature of their bearing on dignity and well-being. ;I continue to develop these claims in Chapter 4 by considering several character types that are unsatisfactorily oriented toward the dignity and well-being of individuals. Though a character type may exhibit certain virtues, the vices present in it may render the overall orientation it represents ignoble and unappealing. By first considering a range of unsatisfactory orientations, I prepare the way for presentation of what I take to be the most satisfactory one

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Harman Vs. Virtue Theory.Chris Tucker - 2004 - Southwest Philosophy Review 21 (1):137-145.
A New Approach to Character Traits in Light of Psychology.Christian Miller - 2016 - In Iskra Fileva (ed.), Questions of Character. Oxford University Press. pp. 249-267.
Virtue Ethics, Character, and Normative Receptivity.Candace Upton - 2008 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 5 (1):77-95.
Character and Culture.Lester H. Hunt - 1997 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
The indispensability of character.Joel J. Kupperman - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (2):239-250.
Moral Character: An Empirical Theory.Christian B. Miller - 2013 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The Role of Character in Business Ethics.Edwin M. Hartman - 1998 - Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (3):547-559.
A Conception of Dignity and the Politics of Virtue.Minh Tuan Nguyen - 2003 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine
Character Traits, Virtues, and Vices.Michael DePaul - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 9:141-157.
The Possibility of Virtue.Miguel Alzola - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2):377-404.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references