5

In David Papineau (ed.), Is the Best Good Enough? Oxford University Press. pp. 93-106 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review of Peter Clark (ed.), Katherine Hawley (ed.), Philosophy of Science Today. [REVIEW]Peter Lipton - 2004 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (1).
The Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - Cogito 5 (1):9-14.
Review Symposium.Ken Binmore - 1985 - Thesis Eleven 12 (1):145-155.
Book reviews. [REVIEW]Peter Lipton - 1992 - Mind 101 (401):171-175.
Books Reviews.Peter Lipton - 1991 - Mind 100 (398):293-295.
A Real Contrast.Peter Lipton - 1987 - Analysis 47 (4):207 - 208.
Kant on wheels.Peter Lipton - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (2-3):215-219.
Inference to the Best Explanation: Is It Really Different from Mill’s Methods?Steven Rappaport - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (1):65-80.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-08-21

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Van Fraassen's Critique Of Inference To The Best Explanation.Samir Okasha - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (4):691-710.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references