The Substitutional Paradox in Russell's 1907 Letter to Hawtrey [see corrected reprint in next issue]

Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 22 (1):47-55 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This note presents a transcription of Russell's letter to Hawtrey of 22 January 1907 accompanied by some proposed emendations. In that letter Russell describes the paradox that he says "pilled" the "substitutional theory" developed just before he turned to the theory of types. A close paraphrase of the derivation of the paradox in a contemporary Lemmon-style natural deduction system shows which axioms the theory must assume to govern its characteristic notion of substituting individuals and propositions for each other in other propositions. Other discussions of this paradox in the literature are mentioned. I conclude with remarks about the significance of the paradox for Russell.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Substitutional Paradox in Russell's 1907 Letter to Hawtrey [corrected reprint].Bernard Linsky - 2002 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 22 (2).
Russell's substitutional theory of classes and relations.Gregory Landini - 1987 - History and Philosophy of Logic 8 (2):171-200.
Variable, Structure, and Restricted Generality.S. Gandon - 2013 - Philosophia Mathematica 21 (2):200-219.
Russell's hidden substitutional theory.Gregory Landini - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The 1900 Turn in Bertrand Russell’s Logic, the Emergence of his Paradox, and the Way Out.Nikolay Milkov - 2016 - Siegener Beiträge Zur Geschichte Und Philosophie der Mathematik 7:29-50.
On Russell's vulnerability to Russell's paradox.James Levine - 2001 - History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (4):207-231.
Zermelo and Russell's Paradox: Is There a Universal set?G. Landini - 2013 - Philosophia Mathematica 21 (2):180-199.
New Evidence concerning Russell's Substitutional Theory of Classes.Gregory Landini - 1989 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 9 (1):26.
Intuition and Russell´s Paradox.Margaret Cuonzo - 2001 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 5 (1-2):73–86.
Relatives of the Russell Paradox.Kees Doets - 1999 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 45 (1):73-83.
Russell's way out of the paradox of propositions.André Fuhrmann - 2002 - History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (3):197-213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
18 (#790,592)

6 months
9 (#259,174)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bernard Linsky
University of Alberta

Citations of this work

The functions of Russell’s no class theory.Kevin C. Klement - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):633-664.
Review of Terence Parsons, Articulating Medieval Logic. [REVIEW]Paul Thom - 2015 - History and Philosophy of Logic 36 (2):178-181.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references