Temporising and respect for patient self-determination

Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (3):161-167 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The principle of self-determination plays a crucial role in contemporary clinical ethics. Somewhat simplified, it states that it is ultimately the patient who should decide whether or not to accept suggested treatment or care. Although the principle is much discussed in the academic literature, one important aspect has been neglected, namely the fact that real-world decision making is temporally extended, in the sense that it generally takes some time from the point at which the physician determines that there is a decision to be made and that the patient is capable of making it, to the point at which the patient is actually asked for his or her view. This article asks under what circumstances, if any, temporising—waiting to pose a certain treatment question to a patient judged to have decision-making capacity—is compatible with the principle of self-determination.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Patient Self-Determination Act: A Legal Solution for a Moral Dilemma.Jos V. M. Welie - 1992 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1 (1):75.
Examining the suitability of the principle of subsidiarity for bioethics.Jaro Kotalik - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (4):371-390.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-19

Downloads
28 (#138,667)

6 months
8 (#1,326,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?