- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Inconsistent preferences among gambles
Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (2):390 (1971)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The influence of probabilities on the response mode bias in utility elicitation.Christopher Schwand, Rudolf Vetschera & Lea M. Wakolbinger - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (3):395-416.
High-probabilities, model-preference and default arguments.Hector Geffner - 1992 - Minds and Machines 2 (1):51-70.
In defense of adaptive preferences.Donald W. Bruckner - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (3):307 - 324.
Preference probability between gambles as a step function of event probability.R. Duncan Luce & Elizabeth F. Shipley - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (1):42.
Heterogeneity in choices on Iowa Gambling Task: preference for infrequent–high magnitude punishment. [REVIEW]Varsha Singh & Azizuddin Khan - 2008 - Mind and Society 8 (1):43-57.
Second-Order Preferences and Instrumental Rationality.Donald W. Bruckner - 2011 - Acta Analytica 26 (4):367-385.
Importance of variance preferences in gambling decisions.Paul Slovic & Sarah Lichtenstein - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):646.
Ordered preference differences without ordered preferences.Peter C. Fishburn - 1986 - Synthese 67 (2):361 - 368.
Choice, rate of response, and rate of gambling.Howard C. Rachlin & Marvin Frankel - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):444.
A preference for selfish preferences: The problem of motivations in rational choice political science.Ignacio Sánchez-Cuenca - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3):361-378.
Utility theory with inexact preferences and degrees of preference.Peter C. Fishburn - 1970 - Synthese 21 (2):204 - 221.
Reasoning about outcome probabilities and values in preference reversals.Marcus Selart, Ole Boe & Tommy Garling - 1999 - Thinking and Reasoning 5 (2):175 – 188.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-22
Downloads
31 (#501,295)
6 months
6 (#522,885)
2013-11-22
Downloads
31 (#501,295)
6 months
6 (#522,885)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
What are axiomatizations good for?Itzhak Gilboa, Andrew Postlewaite, Larry Samuelson & David Schmeidler - 2019 - Theory and Decision 86 (3-4):339-359.
A Dynamic, Stochastic, Computational Model of Preference Reversal Phenomena.Joseph G. Johnson & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (4):841-861.
Making trade-offs: A probabilistic and context-sensitive model of choice behavior.Claudia González-Vallejo - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (1):137-155.
Reasoning about outcome probabilities and values in preference reversals.Marcus Selart, Ole Boe & Tommy Garling - 1999 - Thinking and Reasoning 5 (2):175 – 188.
Preference reversal in quantum decision theory.Vyacheslav I. Yukalov & Didier Sornette - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo