Autonomy, Beneficence, and Gezelligheid: Lessons in Moral Theory from the Dutch

Hastings Center Report 39 (5):39-45 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

American bioethicists lack the theoretical resources to work in cross‐cultural settings. All we have are two approaches to ethics—principles vs. narratives—that are mostly at odds, and neither of which is up to the job. If moral principles are too abstract to be useful, and if stories cannot provide moral authority, then where do we find our moral norms?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-11

Downloads
24 (#639,942)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

CQ Sources/Bibliography.Bette Anton - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (3):402-406.
CQ Sources/Bibliography.Bette Anton - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):348-350.
CQ Sources/Bibliography.Bette Anton - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (2):230-231.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references