Analytic/synthetic and semantic theory

Synthese 21 (3-4):439 - 448 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A somewhat simplified version of Jerrold J. Katz's theory of the analytic/synthetic distinction for natural languages is presented. Katz's account is criticized on the following grounds. (1) the antonymy operator is not well defined; it leaves certain sentences without readings. (2) The account of negation is defective; it has the consequence that certain nonsynonymous sentences are marked as synonymous. (3) The account of entailment is defective; it has the consequence that analytic sentences entail synthetic ones. (4) Katz's account of indeterminable sentences is criticized; it has the consequence that certain logical truths are not marked as analytic. (5) Katz's semantics provides no account of truth, so that he is unable to show that analytic sentences are true and that indeterminable sentences are not.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
81 (#152,258)

6 months
2 (#299,675)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Jarrold J. Katz’s Theory of Meanings.Leon Koj - 1973 - Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 4:75-112.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references