Natural Divine Causation, Causal Exclusion, and Overdetermination: Comment on Mikael Leidenhag

Zygon 56 (2):434-446 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his article “The Blurred Line between Theistic Evolution and Intelligent Design” and his response “The Problem of Natural Divine Causation and the Benefits of Partial Causation”, Mikael Leidenhag uses Jaegwon Kim’s work on causal exclusion to critique what he calls “Natural Divine Causation” (NDC). Although I agree with Leidenhag that questions about divine action can fruitfully be posed in terms of Kim’s so-called Causal Exclusion Argument, I take issue with the way he attempts to carry out this task and the reasons he offers against the overdetermination response to the Causal Exclusion Argument.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,362

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-25

Downloads
31 (#602,200)

6 months
8 (#447,211)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Lim
Duke Kunshan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Physicalism, or Something near Enough.Jaegwon Kim - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):306-310.
Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays.Jaegwon Kim - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):579-607.
Mind in a Physical World.Jaegwon Kim - 1998 - Philosophy 75 (291):131-135.
Causal overdetermination.Martin Bunzl - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (3):134-150.

View all 13 references / Add more references