A Distinction Without a Difference? Good Advice for Moral Error Theorists

Ratio 26 (3):373-390 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the prospects of different forms of moral error theory. It is argued that only a suitably local error theory would make good sense of the fact that it is possible to give and receive genuinely good moral advice

Other Versions

reprint Lillehammer, Hallvard (2014) "A distinction without a difference? Good advice for moral error theorists". In Streumer, Bart, Irrealism in Ethics, pp. 23–40: Wiley-Blackwell (2014)

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-16

Downloads
962 (#22,931)

6 months
106 (#56,394)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hallvard Lillehammer
University of Sheffield

Citations of this work

Two types of debunking arguments.Peter Königs - 2018 - Philosophical Psychology 31 (3):383-402.
Epistemology shmepistemology: moral error theory and epistemic expressivism.Stephen Ingram - 2018 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 61 (7):649-669.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dispositional Theories of Value.Michael Smith, David Lewis & Mark Johnston - 1989 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 63 (1):89-174.
The error in the error theory.Stephen Finlay - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3):347-369.
Can We Believe the Error Theory?Bart Streumer - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy 110 (4):194-212.

Add more references