Research Ethics 8 (1):9-23 (2012)

Authors
Sapfo Lignou
University College London
Abstract
The aim of this article is to examine whether informational manipulation, used intentionally by the researcher to increase recruitment in the research study, can be morally acceptable. We argue that this question is better answered by following a non-normative account, according to which the ethical justifiability of informational manipulation should not be relevant to its definition. The most appropriate criterion by which informational manipulation should be considered as morally acceptable or not is the researcher’s special moral duties towards their subjects. We also propose that a broader definition of manipulation of information should be adopted (than that already existing in the literature) since informational manipulation can affect not only a person’s beliefs but also their desires in decision-making. We conclude that manipulation of information can either be used to protect the potential subject and facilitate the informed consent process or be used to exploit and merely use a person for scientific goals.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/1747016112437319
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics.Neil C. Manson - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What’s Wrong with Motive Manipulation?Eric M. Cave - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (2):129-144.
A Framework for Assessing the Moral Status of Manipulation,.J. S. Blumenthal-Barby - 2014 - In Christian Coons Michael Weber (ed.), Manipulation. Oxford University Press. pp. 121-134.
Capital Punishment as a Response to Evil.Peter Brian Barry - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (2):245-264.
Profiling Color.J. Angelo Corlett - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (1-2):21 - 32.
Privacy and Policy for Genetic Research.Judith Wagner DeCew - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):5-14.
Conceptual Obstacles in Computerized Medical Diagnosis.Victor L. Yu - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (1):67-76.
A New Approach to Manipulation Arguments.Patrick Todd - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 152 (1):127-133.
Accept No Substitutes: The Ethics of Alternatives.Joel Marks - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (s1):S16-S18.
Objecting Morally.C. A. J. Coady - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (4):375-397.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-31

Total views
25 ( #455,864 of 2,507,596 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,871 of 2,507,596 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes