To move or not to move
Abstract
A previous observational study suggested that when faced with a partner with its back turned, chimpanzees tend to move around to the front of a non-attending partner and then gesture — rather than gesturing once to attract attention and then again to convey a specific intent. We investigated this preference experimentally by presenting six orangutans, five gorillas, nine chimpanzees, and four bonobos with a food begging situation in which we varied the body orientation of an experimenter with respect to the subject and the location of the food. These manipulations allowed us to measure whether subjects preferred to move around to face E or to use signals to attract her attention before they begged for food. Results showed that all species moved around to face E and then produced visual gestures, instead of using tactile/ auditory gestures behind E to call her attention. Species differences were apparent particularly when the food and E were in different locations. Unlike gorillas and orangutans, chimpanzees and bonobos produced their gestures in front of E in all conditions, including that in which subjects had to leave the food behind to communicate with her. Implications of these results are discussed in the context of the evolution of social cognition in great apes.My notes
Similar books and articles
To move or not to move: How apes adjust to the attentional state of others.Katja Liebal, Josep Call, Michael Tomasello & Simone Pika - 2004 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 5 (2):199-219.
Chimpanzees show more understanding of human attentional states when they request food in the experimenter’s hand than on the table.Yuko Hattori, Masaki Tomonaga & Kazuo Fujita - 2011 - Interaction Studies 12 (3):418-429.
Chimpanzees show more understanding of human attentional states when they request food in the experimenter’s hand than on the table.Yuko Hattori, Masaki Tomonaga & Kazuo Fujita - 2011 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 12 (3):418-429.
When apes point the finger: Three great ape species fail to use a conspecifics imperative pointing gesture.Sebastian Tempelmann, Juliane Kaminski & Katja Liebal - 2013 - Interaction Studies 14 (1):7-23.
When apes point the finger: Three great ape species fail to use a conspecific’s imperative pointing gesture.Sebastian Tempelmann, Juliane Kaminski & Katja Liebal - 2013 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 14 (1):7-23.
Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) show more understanding of human attentional states when they request food in the experimenter’s hand than on the table.Yuko Hattori, Masaki Tomonaga & Kazuo Fujita - 2011 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 12 (3):418-429.
When apes point the finger.Sebastian Tempelmann, Juliane Kaminski & Katja Liebal - 2013 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 14 (1):7-23.
What Chimpanzees Know about Seeing, Revisited: An Explanation of the Third Kind.Josep Call & Michael Tomasello - 2005 - In Naomi Eilan, Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack & Johannes Roessler (eds.), Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds. Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford University Press. pp. 45--64.
Preparing to move and deciding not to move☆.Gilberto Gomes - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):457-459.
A Comparison of the Socio-communicative Behavior in Chimpanzees and Bonobos.Jared P. Taglialatela, Scott C. Milne & Robert E. Evans - 2018 - In Laura Desirèe Di Paolo, Fabio Di Vincenzo & Francesca De Petrillo (eds.), Evolution of Primate Social Cognition. Springer Verlag. pp. 79-93.
Great apes search for longer following humans’ ostensive signals, but do not then follow their gaze.Fumihiro Kano, Richard Moore, Chris Krupenye, Satoshi Hirata, Masaki Tomongaga & Josep Call - 2018 - Animal Cognition 21 (5):715-728.
Production and comprehension of gestures between orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus) in a referential communication game.Richard Moore, Josep Call & Michael Tomasello - 2015 - PLoS ONE:pone.0129726.
The evolution of sexuality in chimpanzees and bonobos.Richard W. Wrangham - 1993 - Human Nature 4 (1):47-79.
Brain Functional Asymmetry of Chimpanzees : the Example of Auditory Laterality.Julia Sikorska, Maciej Kapusta, Katarzyna Wejchert, Anna Jakucińska, Maciej Trojan & Justyna Szymańska - 2017 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 48 (1):87-92.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-10-16
Downloads
1 (#1,499,562)
6 months
1 (#449,220)
2020-10-16
Downloads
1 (#1,499,562)
6 months
1 (#449,220)
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
There Is No Special Problem of Mindreading in Nonhuman Animals.Marta Halina - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (3):473-490.
Contrasting the Social Cognition of Humans and Nonhuman Apes: The Shared Intentionality Hypothesis.Josep Call - 2009 - Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (2):368-379.
How apes get into and out of joint actions.Emilie Genty, Raphaela Heesen, Jean-Pascal Guéry, Federico Rossano, Klaus Zuberbühler & Adrian Bangerter - 2020 - Interaction Studies 21 (3):353-386.
How apes get into and out of joint actions : Shared intentionality as an interactional achievement.Emilie Genty, Raphaela Heesen, Jean-Pascal Guéry, Federico Rossano, Klaus Zuberbühler & Adrian Bangerter - 2020 - Interaction Studies 21 (3):353-386.
Chimpanzees are mindreaders: On why they attribute seeing rather than sensing.Robert Lurz & Vincent Andreassi - 2022 - Philosophical Psychology 35 (6):814-841.