Student Perceptions of Faculty Use of Cheating Deterrents

Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (4):327-333 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Evidence is provided on faculty use of cheating deterrents for in-class exams. The evidence comes from a survey of students who report on their most recent in-class exam in a randomly selected course that they are taking. Three types of cheating are considered: (i) advance knowledge of exam questions; (ii) copying; and (iii) other improper student actions during the exam. The deterrents examined consist of the following: (i) a rate of repeating questions; (ii) multiple versions of the exam and seating arrangements; and (iii) monitoring. The sample size is small but may cover about one-fourth of the faculty at the institution at which the survey was conducted

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Action and ethics education.Robert Liebler - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (2):153-160.
Cheating on Exams in the Iranian EFL Context.Alireza Ahmadi - 2012 - Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (2):151-170.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-02

Downloads
36 (#431,270)

6 months
9 (#298,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?