Critical Horizons 22 (3):287-305 (2021)

Authors
Eli B. Lichtenstein
Northwestern University
Abstract
The classical theory of sovereignty describes sovereignty as absolute and undivided yet no early modern state could claim such features. Historical record instead suggests that sovereignty was always divided and contested. In this article I argue that Foucault offers a competing account of sovereignty that underlines such features and is thus more historically apt. While commentators typically assume that Foucault’s understanding of sovereignty is borrowed from the classical theory, I demonstrate instead that he offers a sui generis interpretation, which results from the application of his general strategic conception of power to sovereignty itself. In construing sovereignty through a “matrix” of civil war, Foucault thus deprives it of the absoluteness traditionally attributed to it. Instead, he views sovereignty as constituted by conflictual and mobile power relations, a precarious political technology that deploys violence to restore its authority. I also motivate Foucault’s contention that popular sovereignty remains fundamentally continuous with the absolutist sovereignty it succeeds, insofar as it masks and thereby perpetuates unequal power relations in conditions of social conflict. According to Foucault, sovereignty is not a fact of power but a contestory claim, a discourse whose mutability helps to explain its persistence today.
Keywords Foucault  Absolutist sovereignty  Popular sovereignty  Hobbes  Power  Conflict
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/14409917.2021.1953750
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Introduction.Donald Davidson - 2005 - In Truth and Predication. Harvard University Press. pp. 1-6.
Without Sovereignty or Miracles: Reply to Birmingham.J. M. Bernstein - 2010 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24 (1):21-31.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

About the Impossibility of Absolute State Sovereignty: The Early Years.Jorge Emilio Núñez - 2014 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 27 (4):645-664.
Politics and Sovereign Power: Considerations on Foucault.Lorna Weir & Brian C. J. Singer - 2006 - European Journal of Social Theory 9 (4):443-465.
Law and Sovereignty.Pavlos Eleftheriadis - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (5):535-569.
About the Impossibility of Absolute State Sovereignty: The Middle Ages.Jorge Emilio Núñez - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (2):235-250.
Sovereignty as Autonomy.Raf Geenens - 2017 - Law and Philosophy 36 (5):495-524.
La sovranità mutilata. Considerazioni su un’esperienza post-foucaultiana.Paolo Napoli - 2015 - Scienza and Politica. Per Una Storia Delle Dottrine 27 (52).
A Genealogy of State Sovereignty.Lorenzo Zucca - 2015 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 16 (2):399-422.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-08-06

Total views
34 ( #324,593 of 2,462,325 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #25,456 of 2,462,325 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes