Automating the Repair of Faulty Logical Theories

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 27 (4):530-530 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This thesis aims to develop a domain-independent system for repairing faulty Datalog-like theories by combining three existing techniques: abduction, belief revision, and conceptual change. Accordingly, the proposed system is named the ABC repair system. Given an observed assertion and a current theory, abduction adds axioms, which explain that observation by making the corresponding assertion derivable from the expanded theory. Belief revision incorporates a new piece of information which conflicts with the input theory by deleting old axioms. Conceptual change uses the reformation algorithm for blocking unwanted proofs or unblocking wanted proofs. The former two techniques change an axiom as a whole, while reformation changes the language in which the theory is written. These three techniques are complementary. But they have not previously been combined into one system. We are working on aligning these three techniques in ABC, which is capable of repairing logical theories with better result than each individual technique alone. In addition, ABC extends abduction and belief revision to operate on preconditions: the former deletes preconditions from rules, and the latter adds preconditions to rules. Datalog is used as the underlying logic of theories in this thesis, but the proposed system has the potential to be adapted to theories in other logics.Abstract prepared by Xue Li by taking directly from the thesis.E-mail: [email protected].

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Identifying logical evidence.Ben Martin - 2020 - Synthese 198 (10):9069-9095.
Logical Constants.K. Warmbrõd - 1999 - Mind 108 (431):503 - 538.
Logical constants.J. A. Chadwick - 1927 - Mind 36 (141):1-11.
What Counts as Evidence for a Logical Theory?Ole Thomassen Hjortland - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Logic 16 (7):250-282.
Logical Revision by Counterexamples: A Case Study of the Paraconsistent Counterexample to Ex Contradictione Quodlibet.Seungrak Choi - 2019 - In Byunghan Kim, Jörg Brendle, Gyesik Lee, Fenrong Liu, R. Ramanujam, Shashi M. Srivastava, Akito Tsuboi & Liang Yu (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th and 15th Asian Logic Conferences. World Scientific Publishing Company. pp. 141-167.
Logical form and natural language.Stephen P. Stich - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 28 (6):397-418.
Logical Theories of Intention and the Database Perspective.Yoav Shoham - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (6):633-647.
Decidability of mereological theories.Hsing-Chien Tsai - 2009 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 18 (1):45-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-07

Downloads
6 (#1,430,516)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references