Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (3):231-242 (2013)
Abstract |
The focus of this article is university teachers’ and students’ views of plagiarism, plagiarism detection, and the use of plagiarism detection software as learning support. The data were collected from teachers and students who participated in a pilot project to test plagiarism detection software at a major university in Finland. The data were analysed through factor analysis, T-tests and inductive content analysis. Three distinct reasons for plagiarism were identified: intentional, unintentional and contextual. The teachers did not utilise plagiarism detection to support student learning to any great extent. We discuss the pedagogical implications and suggest that the contextual reasons for plagiarism require focus primarily on study strategies, whereas the intentional reasons require profound discussion about attitudes and conceptions of good learning and university-level study habits
|
Keywords | Student plagiarism Plagiarism detection Instruction Academic writing |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10805-013-9181-z |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Academic Plagiarism: Explanatory Factors From Students' Perspective. [REVIEW]Jaume Sureda-Negre - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):217-232.
The Student Lifeworld and the Meanings of Plagiarism.Peter Ashworth, Ranald MacDonald & Madeleine Freewood - 2003 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 34 (2):257-278.
“Does Plagiarism Mean Anything? LOL.” Students’ Conceptions of Writing and Citing.Erika Löfström - 2011 - Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (4):257-275.
Enhancing the Culture of Research Ethics on University Campuses.Kryste Ferguson, Sandra Masur, Lynne Olson, Julio Ramirez, Elisa Robyn & Karen Schmaling - 2007 - Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (2-4):189-198.
Stolen Language? Plagiarism in Writing.Shelley Angelil-Carter - 2000 - Addison-Wesley Longman Limited.
Citations of this work BETA
Factors of Academic Misconduct in a Cross-Cultural Perspective and the Role of Integrity Systems.Marina Makarova - 2019 - Journal of Academic Ethics 17 (1):51-71.
Reactively, Proactively, Implicitly, Explicitly? Academics’ Pedagogical Conceptions of How to Promote Research Ethics and Integrity.Heidi Hyytinen & Erika Löfström - 2017 - Journal of Academic Ethics 15 (1):23-41.
Conceptions of Plagiarism and Problems in Academic Writing in a Changing Landscape of External Regulation.Erika Löfström, Elisa Huotari & Pauliina Kupila - 2017 - Journal of Academic Ethics 15 (3):277-292.
Evaluation of an Instructional Activity to Reduce Plagiarism in the Communication Classroom.Nicole Kashian, Shannon M. Cruz, Jeong-woo Jang & Kami J. Silk - 2015 - Journal of Academic Ethics 13 (3):239-258.
Severity of Types of Violations of Research Ethics: Perception of Iranian Master’s Students of Translation.Masood Khoshsaligheh, Milad Mehdizadkhani & Sareh Keyvan - 2017 - Journal of Academic Ethics 15 (2):125-140.
View all 10 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Self-Plagiarism or Appropriate Textual Re-Use?Tracey Bretag & Saadia Mahmud - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (3):193-205.
Systems for the Production of Plagiarists? The Implications Arising From the Use of Plagiarism Detection Systems in UK Universities for Asian Learners.Niall Hayes & Lucas Introna - 2005 - Journal of Academic Ethics 3 (1):55-73.
Is There an Effective Approach to Deterring Students From Plagiarizing?Lidija Bilic-Zulle, Josip Azman, Vedran Frkovic & Mladen Petrovecki - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1):139-147.
Technology and Academic Virtue: Student Plagiarism Through the Looking Glass. [REVIEW]Cynthia Townley & Mitch Parsell - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (4):271-277.
The Wrongs of Plagiarism: Ten Quick Arguments.Brook J. Sadler - 2007 - Teaching Philosophy 30 (3):283-291.
Plagiarism Among Dissertations: Prevalence at Online Institutions. [REVIEW]David Carl Ison - 2012 - Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (3):227-236.
A Moral Case Against Certain Uses of Plagiarism Detection Services.J. Caleb Clanton - 2009 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):17-26.
Prevalence of Plagiarism in Recent Submissions to the Croatian Medical Journal.Ksenija Baždarić, Lidija Bilić-Zulle, Gordana Brumini & Mladen Petrovečki - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):223-239.
How Do High School Students Justify Internet Plagiarism?Dominic A. Sisti - 2007 - Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):215 – 231.
Cultural Values, Plagiarism, and Fairness: When Plagiarism Gets in the Way of Learning.Niall Hayes & Lucas D. Introna - 2005 - Ethics and Behavior 15 (3):213 – 231.
An Academic Publisher’s Response to Plagiarism.Bruce R. Lewis, Jonathan E. Duchac & S. Douglas Beets - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (3):489-506.
Effects of Personality and Information Technology on Plagiarism: An Iranian Perspective.Babak Sohrabi, Aryan Gholipour & Neda Mohammadesmaeili - 2011 - Ethics and Behavior 21 (5):367 - 379.
An Analysis of Student Privacy Rights in the Use of Plagiarism Detection Systems.Bo Brinkman - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1255-1266.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-03-09
Total views
25 ( #455,444 of 2,505,783 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,783 )
2013-03-09
Total views
25 ( #455,444 of 2,505,783 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,783 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads