Journal of Business Ethics 84 (2):221 - 235 (2009)

Authors
Jos Leys
University of Ghent
Abstract
As Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) enters the mainstream of professional and institutional investment practice, some perplexities arise. Some SRI market participants are well schooled in finance but are hesitative as to how to apply non-financial criteria in the management of portfolios. Governments too are giving SRI more attention and, in some countries, are discussion whether and how to regulate the SRI market. Advocacy groups are targeting SRI projects through media campaigns using political discourse. Many of the pertinent questions that come with these perplexities are of the philosophical or ethical type and concern legitimisation, demarcation of responsibilities, interpretation of norms and policy formulation. The inclusion of non-financial criteria into investment decision-making leads to a 'puzzle in SRI' for which this article offers a solution. The puzzle arises when the day-to-day implementation of an SRIpolicy coincides with the process of administering justice. Three questions make up that puzzle: (1) what should an investor do when allegations arise about a corporation, (2) what should an investor do when a corporation is brought before a court, (3) what should an investor do when a corporation is found guilty by a court. This article argues, by distinguishing between the rationality of the investor and that of the judge, that allegations, court cases or court verdicts should not be reasons to disinvest from a corporation. This article offers examples from investor practice and points out in which way allegations, court cases and court verdicts make sense for investor behaviour
Keywords Philosophy   Quality of Life Research   Management/Business for Professionals   Economic Growth   Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9705-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Playing by the Rules: Ethical Criteria at an Ethical Investment Fund.Christopher Cowton - 1999 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 8 (1):60-69.
Accounting and Financial Ethics: From Margin to Mainstream?Christopher Cowton - 1999 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 8 (2):99–107.
Accounting and Financial Ethics: From Margin to Mainstream?Christopher Cowton - 1999 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 8 (2):99-107.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Editorial Introduction.Wim Vandekerckhove & Jos Leys - 2007 - Philosophica 80 (3):211-212.
Investing and Intentions in Financial Markets.Carl David Mildenberger - 2019 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 15 (1):71-94.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A New Model of Business: Dual-Investor Theory.Eugene Schlossberger - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):459-474.
A Stakeholder Approach to Investor Preference: The Significance of Demographic and Psychological Factors.Karen Paul & Abdul Beydoun - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:489-500.
On the Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions of Equity Analysts.Christian Fieseler - 2011 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 20 (2):131-147.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
28 ( #410,740 of 2,519,659 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,756 of 2,519,659 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes