Speaking with Frankenstein
Journal of Medical Humanities 43 (2):267-282 (2022)
Abstract
This collaborative essay experimentally applies the insights of Mary Shelley's 1818 gothic fantasy Frankenstein to clinical interactions between present-day physicians and the patients they, akin to Shelley's human protagonist, so often seem to bring to life. Because that process is frequently fraught with unspoken elements of ambivalence, disappointment, frustration, and failure, we find in Shelley's speculative fiction less a cautionary tale of overreach than a dynamic parable of the role that the unspoken, the invisible, and the unknown might play in contemporary physician/patient relationships. Playing with that parable, we consider its relevance to four often unacknowledged dynamics that shape physician/patient interaction: commitment to a false binary of life and death; the tyranny of normative aesthetics; shared negative affect; and the ethics of care and care-denial. To "speak with Frankenstein" is, we show, to make space for the otherwise unspeakable. The result is a more complete model of narrative medicine that accommodates to its ideal of open communication and full attention the persistence of what cannot be said, seen, or known--only imagined and approximated.My notes
Similar books and articles
Making monsters: The philosophy of reproduction in Mary Shelley's frankenstein and the universal films frankenstein and the bride of frankenstein.Ann C. Hall - 2010 - In Thomas Richard Fahy (ed.), The Philosophy of Horror. University Press of Kentucky.
Rereading Frankenstein: What If Victor Frankenstein Had Actually Been Evil?Jason Scott Robert - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (6):21-24.
Frankenstein and Feminism: Contemplating The Memoirs of Elizabeth Frankenstein.Tanya Collings - 2011 - Anthropology of Consciousness 22 (1):66-68.
The Enduring Influence of a Dangerous Narrative: How Scientists Can Mitigate the Frankenstein Myth.Peter Nagy, Ruth Wylie, Joey Eschrich & Ed Finn - 2018 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15 (2):279-292.
Facing the Pariah of Science: The Frankenstein Myth as a Social and Ethical Reference for Scientists.Peter Nagy, Ruth Wylie, Joey Eschrich & Ed Finn - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (2):737-759.
From antiquity to frankenstein. Weiner, Stevens, Rogers frankenstein and its classics. The modern prometheus from antiquity to science fiction. Pp. XIV + 273, ills, maps. London and new York: Bloomsbury academic, 2018. Paper, £21.99, us$29.95 . Isbn: 978-1-350-05487-5. [REVIEW]Camilla Jackson - forthcoming - The Classical Review:1-3.
Hybrids of the Romantic: Frankenstein, Olimpia, and Artificial Life.Silvia Micheletti - 2018 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 41 (2):146-155.
The Monster Analogy: Why Fictional Characters are Frankenstein's Monsters.Essi Varis - 2019 - Substance 48 (1):63-86.
200 Years After Frankenstein.Christopher Nowlin - 2018 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 61 (3):430-449.
Why Frankenstein is a Stigma Among Scientists.Peter Nagy, Ruth Wylie, Joey Eschrich & Ed Finn - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1143-1159.
Lyrical Sociability: The Social Contract and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.Zoe Beenstock - 2015 - Philosophy and Literature 39 (2):406-421.
Frankenstein and Philosophy: The Shocking Truth.Michael Hauskeller, Danilo Chaib, Greg Littmann, Dale Jacquette, Elena Casetta & Luca Tambolo - 2013 - Open Court.
The activity of speaking.Jesús Gerardo Martínez del Castillo - 2015 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics 3 (6-1):59-66.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-08-21
Downloads
4 (#1,239,861)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
2020-08-21
Downloads
4 (#1,239,861)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Hiding From Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law.Martha C. Nussbaum - 2004 - Princeton University Press.
As If: Idealization and Ideals.Kwame Anthony Appiah - 2017 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Tilting the Ethical Lens: Shame, Disgust, and the Body in Question.Ellen K. Feder - 2011 - Hypatia 26 (3):632-650.