Abstract

Moritz Schlick, the founder of the Vienna Circle, is best known for his logical positivist writings of the late 20's and early 30's. He is traditionally seen as having dropped his earlier realist views for an anti-realist positivism. This picture obscures both the complexity and profundity of Schlick's own philosophical development, as well as important issues in understanding positivist and realist assumptions in current debates among philosophers of science. This dissertation seeks to contribute to the contemporary debates through an analysis of Schlick's early as well as his later work, through an examination and evaluation of the principles and motives upon which Schlick based his claims