Informal Logic 37 (2):85-113 (2017)

The paper offers a theoretical investigation into the sources of normativity in practical argumentation. The chief question is: Do we need objectively-minded, unbiased arguers or can we count on “good” argumentative processes in which individual biases cancel each other out? I address this question by analysing a detailed structure of practical argument and its varieties, and by discussing the tenets of a comparative approach to practical reason. I argue that given the comparative structure proposed, reasoned advocacy in argumentative activity upholds reasonableness whenever that activity is adequately designed. I propose some basic rules for such a design of practical argumentation.
Keywords advocacy  argumentation  comparativism  deliberation  polylogue  practical argument
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
DOI 10.22329/il.v37i2.4775
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Environmental Manifestoes.Soledade Rodrigues, Marcin Lewiński & Mehmet Ali Üzelgün - 2019 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 8 (1):12-39.
Illocutionary Pluralism.Marcin Lewiński - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):6687-6714.
The 2015 Paris Climate Conference.Marcin Lewiński & Dima Mohammed - 2019 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 8 (1):65-90.
Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement.Diego Castro - 2021 - Informal Logic 41 (2):245-280.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Considering the Roles of Values in Practical Reasoning Argumentation Evaluation.Michael D. Baumtrog - 2013 - Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA).
Practical-Theoritical Argumentation.Robert T. Craig - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (4):461-474.
Elements for an Argumentative Method of Interpretation.María G. Navarro - 2010 - Rozenberg Quarterly. The Magazine 1 (1).
Did He Jump or Was He Pushed?: Abductive Practical Reasoning.Katie Atkinson - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (2):79-99.
Shaming in and Into Argumentation.Beth Innocenti Manolescu - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (4):379-395.


Added to PP index

Total views
11 ( #849,141 of 2,499,228 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,228 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes