Once More, with Feeling! Reply to Ainslie

Neuroethics 10 (1):155-156 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ainslie’s contribution offers a useful refinement of his powerful model of intertemporal bargaining. However, he focuses mostly on the cognitive mechanisms of choice. I suggest that these interact with emotional, personality, and developmental dynamics that cannot be ignored, either psychologically or neurally.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The will: Interpersonal bargaining versus intrapersonal prediction.Luca Ferrero - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):654-655.
What Can’t We Do with Economics?Ronald B. De Sousa - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:197-209.
What Can’t We Do with Economics?Ronald B. De Sousa - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:197-209.
Intention isn't indivisible.George Ainslie & Barbara Gault - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):365-366.
Hume’s True Scepticism by Donald C. Ainslie.Miriam Schleifer McCormick - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (1):167-168.
A bazaar of opinions mostly fit within picoeconomics.George Ainslie - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):664-670.
What Can’t We Do with Economics?Ronald B. De Sousa - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:197-209.
The central role of anterior cortical midline structures in emotional feeling and consciousness.Alexander Heinzel, Sascha Moerth & Georg Northoff - 2010 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 16 (2):23-47.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-06

Downloads
19 (#746,429)

6 months
11 (#187,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?