Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (3):277-299 (2010)

Abstract
This paper focuses on Ludwig von Mises methodological apriorism. It uses Wittgenstein's private language argument as the basis for a critique of Mises's claim to have found apodictically certain foundations for economic analysis. It is argued instead that Mises's methodology is more fruitfully viewed as an exercise in social ontology, the objective of which is to outline key features of the socio-economic world that social scientific research ought to take into account if it is to be fruitful. The implications of this perspective for three key methodological issues, namely the relationship between theory and history, the possibility of naturalism, and the place of Austrian economics within the discipline of economics as a whole, are brought out.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/1350178X.2010.500503
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Determinism, Free Will, and the Austrian School of Economics.Dawid Megger - 2021 - Journal of Economic Methodology 28 (3):304-321.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Epistemological Problems of Economics.Ludwig Von Mises - 1976 - New York: New York University Press.
Theory and History.Ludwig von Mises - 1969 - New Rochelle, N.Y., Arlington House.
The Treatment of "Irrationality" in the Social Sciences.Ludwig Von Mises - 1943 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 (4):527-546.
Calculation and Chaos: Reply to Caplan.David Gordon - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):171-178.
On Robert Nozick's 'on Austrian Methodology'.Walter Block - 1980 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):397 – 444.
Still Impossible After All These Years: Reply to Caplan.Peter J. Boettke & Peter T. Leeson - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):155-170.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-02-20

Total views
66 ( #171,913 of 2,499,056 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,823 of 2,499,056 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes