Topoi 38 (4):645-658 (2019)

Abstract
Most dialectical models view argumentation as a process of critically testing a standpoint. Further, they assume that what we critically test can be analytically reduced to individual and bi-polar standpoints. I argue that these two assumptions lead to the dominant view of dialectics as a bi-partisan argumentative discussion in which the yes-side argues against the doubter or the no-side. I scrutinise this binary orientation in understanding argumentation by drawing on the main tenets of normative pragmatic and pragma-dialectical theories of argumentation. I develop my argument by showing how argumentative practice challenges these assumptions. I then lay out theoretical reasons for this challenge. This paves the way for an enhanced conceptualisation of dialectical models and their standards of rationality in terms of multi-party discussions, or argumentative polylogues.
Keywords Argumentation  Diairesis  Dialectics  Normative pragmatics  Polylogue  Pragma-dialectics  Quine
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11245-015-9361-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,089
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. Quine - 1951 - [Longmans, Green].
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Fallacies.Charles Leonard Hamblin - 1970 - London, England: Vale Press.

View all 54 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Illocutionary Pluralism.Marcin Lewiński - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):6687-6714.
Demanding a halt to metadiscussions.Beth Innocenti - forthcoming - Argumentation:1-20.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Question of Truth.David Botting - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (4):413-434.
Pragma-Dialectics and Beyond.Daniel Bonevac - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):451-459.
Does Arguing From Coherence Make Sense?Stefano Bertea - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):433-446.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-12-23

Total views
36 ( #313,660 of 2,499,010 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,499,010 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes