A call for an expanded synthesis of developmental and evolutionary paradigms

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):368-369 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Charney's target article continues a critique of genetic blueprint models of development that suggests reconsideration of concepts of adaptation, inheritance, and environment, which can be well illustrated in current research on infant attachment. The concepts of development and adaptation are so heavily based on the model of genetics and inheritance forged in the modern synthesis that they will require reconsideration to accommodate epigenetic inheritance

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Extended Synthesis for Evolutionary Biology.Massimo Pigliucci - 2009 - Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1168:218-228.
Embryology and Evolution 1920-1960: Worlds Apart?Ron Amundson - 2000 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 22 (3):335 - 352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
32 (#471,613)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Lewis
Graduate Theological Union

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Précis of evolution in four dimensions.Eva Jablonka & Marion J. Lamb - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (4):353-365.
Disorganized attachment and reproductive strategies.Andrew J. Lewis & Gregory Tooley - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):35-36.

Add more references