The Acorn 19 (1):19-41 (2019)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Court D. Lewis, author of Repentance and the Right to Forgiveness, presents a rights-based theory of ethics grounded in eirenéism, a needs-based theory of rights that seeks peaceful flourishing for all moral agents. This approach creates a moral relationship between victims and wrongdoers such that wrongdoers owe victims compensatory obligations. However, one further result is that wrongdoers may be owed forgiveness by victims. This leads to the “repugnant implication” that victims may be wrongdoers who do not forgive. Author Lewis addresses the “repugnant implication” by showing that victims are obligated to work toward forgiveness, if not forgiveness itself. Critic Gregory L. Bock argues that victims are not the only ones who can forgive, that the personal dimensions of forgiveness are overlooked, and that the force of the “repugnancy implication” may be questioned. Instead of rights-based eirenéism, Bock supports a virtue ethics framework. Instead of rights-based eirenéism, Bock encourages virtue ethics. Critic David Boersema raises questions about the binding nature of relationships, the dependency of flourishing upon forgiveness, and the nature of needs or rights. Boersema also questions the wisdom of a rights-based approach to forgiveness. Critic Jennifer Kling asks whether a rights-based approach is necessary to ground obligations to meet the needs of others: why not an ethics of care? If a rights-based approach is taken, perhaps a wrongdoer is obligated to not make forgiveness a life good. By disengaging this obligation, we avoid constraining a victim’s work toward forgiveness, especially when the wrongdoing is oppressive. Author Lewis responds to these objections.
|
Keywords | Applied Philosophy General Interest Social and Political Philosophy |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 1092-6534 |
DOI | 10.5840/acorn201919111 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Third Parties and the Social Scaffolding of Forgiveness.Margaret Urban Walker - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (3):495-512.
Taking It Personally: Third-Party Forgiveness, Close Relationships, and the Standing to Forgive.Rosalind Chaplin - 2019 - Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics 9:73-94.
The Philosophy of Forgiveness - Volume II: New Dimensions of Forgiveness.Court D. Lewis (ed.) - 2016 - Vernon Press.
Forgiving While Resenting: Justifying Elective Forgiveness.Cristina Roadevin - 2018 - Ethical Perspectives 25 (2):257-284.
A Feminist Ethic of Forgiveness.Kathryn J. Norlock - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Supererogatory Forgiveness.Espen Gamlund - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (6):540-564.
The Philosophy of Forgiveness - Volume I: Explorations of Forgiveness: Personal, Relational, and Religious.Court D. Lewis, Jennifer Ang, Raja Bahlul, Margaret Betz, Gregory L. Bock, Christopher Cowley, Alexis Elder, William C. Gay, Christopher Ketcham, Man-To Tang & Rebecca Dew - 2016 - Vernon Press.
Forgiveness and Moral Solidarity.Alice MacLachlan - 2008 - In Stephen Bloch-Shulman & David White (eds.), Forgiveness: Probing the Boundaries. Inter-Disciplinary Press.
The Hardened Heart: The Moral Dangers of Not Forgiving.Jessica Wolfendale - 2005 - Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (3):344–363.
What Christians Believe About Forgiveness.Stephen N. Williams - 2011 - Studies in Christian Ethics 24 (2):147-156.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-02-17
Total views
14 ( #728,702 of 2,498,762 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #280,195 of 2,498,762 )
2020-02-17
Total views
14 ( #728,702 of 2,498,762 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #280,195 of 2,498,762 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads