What it means to be a pluralist

Abstract

Michael Walzer has made great contributions to the appreciation of both moral and cultural pluralism in political theory. Nonetheless, there are ways in which Walzer's arguments appear anti-pluralistic. The question of this essay is: why is there so little pluralism in Walzer's political theory, or why does its pluralism run out so soon? Focusing on Spheres of Justice and Nation and Universe, it examines the effect of Walzer's nationalism/statism on his theory, and the constraints his theory faces in considering multiculturalism or political pluralist regimes such as federalism within a state.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
66 (#241,176)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Just War, Citizens’ Responsibility, and Public Intellectuals.Christian Nadeau - 2015 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 274 (4):425-438.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references