The moral significance of being born

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):326-329 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a response to Giubilini and Minerva's defence of infanticide. I argue that any account of moral worth or moral rights that depends on the intrinsic properties of individuals alone is committed to agreeing with Giubilini and Minerva that birth cannot by itself make a moral difference to the moral worth of the infant. However, I argue that moral worth need not depend on intrinsic properties alone. It might also depend on relational and social properties. I claim that the in principle availability of neonates to participate in scaffolded interactions with carers might plausibly be seen as contributing to their moral worth

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
56 (#287,840)

6 months
7 (#441,061)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Neil Levy
Macquarie University

References found in this work

The Moral Significance of Birth.Mary Anne Warren - 1989 - Hypatia 4 (3):46 - 65.
The Moral Significance of Birth.José Luis Bermúdez - 1996 - Ethics 106 (2):378 - 403.
Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.S. S. Sweet - 1984 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1984 (60):227-231.

Add more references