'Taxation, Conscientious Objection and Religious Freedom'

Ethical Perspectives 20 (1):144-153 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is part of a symposium on conscientious objection and religious freedom inspired by the US Catholic Church's claim that being forced to pay for health insurance that covers abortions (the effect of 'Obamacare')is the equivalent of forcing pacifists to fight. This article takes issue with this claim, and shows that while it would be unjust on democratic principles to force pacifists to fight, given their willingness to serve their country in other ways, there is no democratic objection to forcing those who believe abortion to be murder to pay for health insurance coverage that includes abortion.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why Liberal States Must Accommodate Tax Resistors.Jason Brennan - forthcoming - Public Affairs Quarterly.
The Victorian Abortion Law - One Year On.Kevin McGovern - 2009 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 15 (2):1.
Abortion and conscientious objection.Daniel J. Hill - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):344-350.
Victorian Abortion Law Reform Bill 2008.Marcia Riordan - 2008 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 14 (2):7.
Conscientious objection and emergency contraception.Robert F. Card - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):8 – 14.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-04

Downloads
398 (#48,050)

6 months
49 (#82,973)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Annabelle Lever
SciencesPo, Paris

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references