Should Children Have Equal Access to Neuroenhancements?

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (1):21-23 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Persuasive arguments have been put forward for the permissible use of neuroenhancements (Bostrom and Sanberg 2009; Dees 2008). It is argued that in the same way that adults are (and should be) free...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,441

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Morality of Moral Neuroenhancement.Thomas Douglas - forthcoming - In Clausen Jens & Levy Neil (eds.), Handbook of Neuroethics. Springer.
Better brains, better selves? The ethics of neuroenhancements.Richard H. Dees - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (4):371-395.
Why Children Still Shouldn't Have Equal Rights.Laura Purdy - 1994 - International Journal of Children's Righs 2:395-98.
Clear Recommendations to Reform Pediatric Research.Kathryn Weise - 2007 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 29 (5).

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
10 (#986,024)

6 months
3 (#340,711)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ori Lev
Sapir College

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
School Choice and Social Justice.Harry Brighouse - 2002 - British Journal of Educational Studies 50 (3):402-403.
How Not to Be a Hypocrite: School Choice for the Morally Perplexed Parent.Adam Swift - 2005 - British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (2):213-215.
Better brains, better selves? The ethics of neuroenhancements.Richard H. Dees - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (4):371-395.

View all 6 references / Add more references