Intellectually Virtuous Inquirer and the Practical Value of Truth

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 58 (4):54-59 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Veritism is the thesis that the truth is the fundamental epistemic good. According to Duncan Pritchard, the most pressing objections to veritism are the trivial truths objection and the trivial inquiry problem. The former states that veritism entails that trivial truths are as important as deep and important truths. The latter is a problem that a veritist must prefer trivial inquiry that generates many trivial truths to the serious inquiry with the hope but no guarantee to discover some deep and important truth. Both objections arise from the inability of veritism prima facie to properly rate the different types of truths. Pritchard's solution is to approach the truth from the perspective of the intellectually virtuous inquirer who would prefer weighty truth over trivial truth. In my commentary, I criticise the proposed solution as circular reasoning. The necessary virtue for an intellectually virtuous inquirer is that they would prefer the weighty truth over the trivial one and at the same time, the weighty truth is superior because it is the goal for intellectually virtuous inquirer. I suggest another path to substantiate veritism in the face of the two sibling objections. I argue that truth is the fundamental epistemic good as it makes the epistemic realm practically valuable more than any other epistemic good. The weighty truths are preferable to the trivial ones because the practical value of the deep and important truths is usually higher. The suggested path goes away from the attempts to prove the epistemic value of truth only within the epistemic realm, yet I argue it does not compel the intellectually virtuous inquirer to seek the truth only for the sake of practical reasons.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,749

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pritchard on Veritism and Trivial Truths.Anumita Shukla & Mayank Bora - 2024 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 41 (2):273-295.
Pritchard’s Case for Veritism.John Greco - 2021 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 58 (4):46-53.
In Defense of Veritism.Duncan Pritchard - 2021 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 58 (4):22-37.
Wisdom, not Veritism.Shane Ryan - 2021 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 58 (4):60-67.
Trivial Truths and the Aim of Inquiry.NicK Treanor - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (3):552-559.
Truth and epistemic value.Nick Treanor - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):1057-1068.
The trivial argument for epistemic value pluralism. Or how I learned to stop caring about truth.Berit Brogaard - 2009 - In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Epistemic value. New York: Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

5 (#1,589,109)

6 months
2 (#1,487,113)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sergei Levin
Trinity College, Dublin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references