Experimental philosophy

Analysis 69 (4):761-769 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Levin argues that the results of the most methodologically sound and philosophically relevant studies discussed in this volume [ Experimental Philosophy] could have been obtained from the armchair, and thus that experimental philosophy may not present a serious challenge to the traditional methods of analytic philosophy

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-09-23

Downloads
231 (#82,846)

6 months
4 (#573,918)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Janet Levin
University of Southern California

Citations of this work

Thought Experiments in Experimental Philosophy.Kirk Ludwig - 2018 - In Michael T. Stuart, Yiftach Fehige & James Robert Brown (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. London: Routledge. pp. 385-405.
Metaphilosophy.Yuri Cath - 2011 - Oxford Bibliographies in Philosophy.
Levy on Neuroscience, Psychology, and Moral Intuitions.Janet Levin - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):10-11.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A defense of the use of intuitions in philosophy.Ernest Sosa - 2009 - In Michael Bishop & Dominic Murphy (eds.), Stich and His Critics. Blackwell. pp. 101--112.

Add more references