Authors
Annabelle Lever
Sciences Po, Paris
Abstract
According to Robert Talisse, ‘we have sufficient epistemological reasons to be democrats’ and these reasons support democracy even when we are tempted to doubt the legitimacy of democratic government. As epistemic agents, we care about the truth of our beliefs, and have reasons to want to live in an environment conducive to forming and acting on true, rather than false, beliefs. Democracy, Talisse argues, is the best means to provide such an environment. Hence, he concludes that epistemic agency, correctly understood, supports the legitimacy of democracy. This reply highlights the interest, but also the difficulties, of this argument and, in particular, of its assumptions about epistemic agency, morality and democracy.
Keywords democracy, epistemic agency, justice, morality, Talisse
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13698230.2014.995502
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

An Instrumental Argument for a Human Right to Democracy.Thomas Christiano - 2011 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (2):142-176.
Sustaining Democracy: Folk Epistemology and Social Conflict.Robert B. Talisse - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (4):500-519.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Response to Lever.Robert B. Talisse - 2015 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (1):82-85.
Democratic Epistemology and Democratic Morality: The Appeal and Challenges of Peircean Pragmatism.Annabelle Lever & Clayton Chin - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (4):432-453.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Critique of Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy.Thom Brooks - 2009 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 50-54.
Democracy and Ignorance: Reply to Friedman.Robert B. Talisse - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (4):453-466.
In Defense of Democracy as a Way of Life: A Reply to Talisse's Pluralist Objection.Shane J. Ralston - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):pp. 629-659.
Communities of Inquiry and Democratic Politics.Cillian McBride - 2009 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 71-74.
An Epistemological Defense of Democracy.Robert B. Talisse - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2-3):281-291.
A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy.Joshua Forstenzer - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (1):161-164.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-09-10

Total views
514 ( #15,597 of 2,462,742 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #17,903 of 2,462,742 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes