History of Political Thought 27 (1):50-90 (2006)

The thesis that republicanism was only suited for small states was given its decisive eighteenth-century formulation by Montesquieu, who emphasized not only republics' need for homogeneity and virtue but also the difficulty of constraining military and executive power in large republics. Hume and Publius famously replaced small republics' virtue and homogeneity with large republics' plurality of contending factions. Even those who shared this turn to modern liberty, commerce and the accompanying heterogeneity of interests, however, did not all agree with or know about Publius' institutional responses to the problems of executive and military power. Throughout the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, and on both sides of the Atlantic, it remained a live question whether large states could be stable moderate republics, with responses ranging from embraces of Montesquieuian limited monarchy, to denials that there was any real large-republic problem at all, with a variety of institutional solutions in between for those who thought there was a real but soluble large-republic problem
Keywords Alexis De Tocqueville  Benjamin Constant  David Hume  Destutt De Tracy  Eighteenth-Century Political Thought  Federalism  Federalism Papers  Jacques Necker  liberalism  Montesquieu  Publius  republicanism  Thomas Jefferson  Thomas Paine  Willliam Paley
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Arsehole Aristocracy.Christopher Brooke - 2018 - European Journal of Political Theory 17 (4):391-410.
Federalism.Andreas Føllesdal - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Balance of Power and the Power Struggles of the Polis.Kevin Blachford - 2021 - Journal of International Political Theory 17 (3):429-447.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Montesquieu on Moderation, Monarchy and Reform.Andrea Radasanu - 2010 - History of Political Thought 31 (2):283-308.
Confucianism and Civic Virtue.Gordon B. Mower - 2013 - Social Philosophy Today 29:75-87.
Montesquieu: Critique of Republicanism?Céline Spector - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):38-53.
Machiavelli's Liberal Republican Legacy.Paul Anthony Rahe (ed.) - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.
‘Presidentialism’ in the Ex-Soviet Union.J. Blondel - 2012 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 13 (1):1-36.
Machiavelli’s Republican Political Theory.Dragica Vujadinovic - 2014 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (1):43-68.


Added to PP index

Total views
29 ( #397,013 of 2,520,403 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,555 of 2,520,403 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes