Darwin versus Kant and Hume


I claim evolution through natural selection is inconsistent with Kantian epistemology, because there is nothing about humans or 'the mind' which does not vary, so its inappropriate to base universal laws of nature on how the variable mind might generates experience. I also claim that the apparent self sufficient world presented by natural selection is at least suspiciously inconsistent with Hume's views that it is impossible to see how anything could itself (be sufficient to) produce anything.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Kant's Copernican Revolution.Frank Thilly - 1925 - The Monist 35 (2):329-345.
The tower experiment and the copernican revolution.Gunnar Andersson - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (2):143 – 152.
Philosophy in the information age.Terrell Ward Bynum - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (3):420-442.
Leibniz and the post-copernican universe. Koyre revisited.R. M. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):309-327.


Added to PP

170 (#95,337)

6 months
74 (#36,944)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references