Dual Loyalty among Military Health Professionals: Human Rights and Ethics in Times of Armed Conflict

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (4):381-391 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wars must be won if our country … is to be protected from unthinkable outcomes, as the events on September 11th most recently illustrated…. This best protection unequivocally requires armed forces having military physicians committed to doing what is required to secure victory…. As opposed to needing neutral physicians, we need military physicians who can and do identify as closely as possible with the military so that they, too, can carry out the vital part they play in meeting the needs of the mission.Counterpoint:We believe the role of the “physician–soldier” to be an inherent moral impossibility because the military physician, in an environment of military control, is faced with the difficult problems of mixed agency that include obligations to the “fighting strength” and … “national security.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Teaching Military Medical Ethics: Another Look at Dual Loyalty and Triage.Michael L. Gross - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (4):458-464.
Human Rights and Violence in Contemporary Context.James Turner Johnson - 1998 - Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (2):319 - 328.
Religion, Violence, and Human Rights.James Turner Johnson - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):1-14.
Cultural Heritage in Human Rights and Humanitarian Law.Ana Filipa Vrdoljak - 2011 - International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
61 (#259,066)

6 months
9 (#295,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?