What Is the Goal of Proof? A Reaction to "What Do Mathematicians Want?" by Don Fallis

Logique Et Analyse 45 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to "What Is the Goal of Proof?" by Aaron Lercher.Don Fallis - 2002 - Logique Et Analyse 45.
A Defense of a Probabilistic Method of Establishing Mathematical Truths.Don Thomas Fallis - 1995 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine
The Reliability of Randomized Algorithms.D. Fallis - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (2):255-271.
On Mathematicians' Different Standards When Evaluating Elementary Proofs.Matthew Inglis, Juan Pablo Mejia-Ramos, Keith Weber & Lara Alcock - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (2):270-282.
Of Proofs, Mathematicians, and Computers.Astrik Yepremyan - unknown
What Do Mathematicians Want? Probabilistic Proofs and the Epistemic Goals of Mathematicians.Don Fallis - 2002 - Logique Et Analyse 45.
Goal-directed proof theory.Dov M. Gabbay - 2000 - Boston: Kluwer Academic. Edited by Nicola Olivetti.
What do mathematicians teach us about the world? An anthropological perspective.Paul Jorion - 1999 - Dialectical Anthropology 24 (1):45-98.
The Epistemic Status of Probabilistic Proof.Don Fallis - 1997 - Journal of Philosophy 94 (4):165-186.
Proof theory: a selection of papers from the Leeds Proof Theory Programme, 1990.Peter Aczel, Harold Simmons & Stanley S. Wainer (eds.) - 1992 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Young mathematicians at work: The role of contexts and models in the emergence of proof.C. T. Fosnot & B. Jacob - 2009 - In Despina A. Stylianou, Maria L. Blanton & Eric J. Knuth (eds.), Teaching and Learning Proof Across the Grades: A K-16 Perspective. Routledge. pp. 102--119.
Beauty Is Not Simplicity: An Analysis of Mathematicians' Proof Appraisals.Matthew Inglis & Andrew Aberdein - 2015 - Philosophia Mathematica 23 (1):87-109.
[Omnibus Review]. [REVIEW]Don Fallis - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (3):1196-1200.
Knowledge of Mathematics without Proof.Alexander Paseau - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (4):775-799.
Handbook of proof theory.Samuel R. Buss (ed.) - 1998 - New York: Elsevier.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron Lercher
Louisiana State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references