Political Understanding

British Journal of Political Science 1 (1) (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Public opinion research has shown that voters accept many falsehoods about politics. This observation is widely considered troubling for democracy—and especially participatory ideals of democracy. I argue that this influential narrative is nevertheless flawed, because it misunderstands the nature of political understanding. Drawing on philosophical examinations of scientific modelling, I demonstrate that accepting falsehoods within one’s model of political reality is compatible with—and indeed can positively enhance—one’s understanding of that reality. Thus, the observation that voters accept many political falsehoods does not necessarily establish that they lack political understanding. I then address three worries: that voters cannot generally engage in such political modelling; that political modelling obscures facts that are crucial to political understanding; and that successful political modelling would require knowing that one’s model contains falsehoods. My responses reveal how, going forward, we should measure political ignorance; and they highlight the standing importance of participatory democracy.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-29

Downloads
194 (#105,841)

6 months
78 (#75,439)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Maxime C. Lepoutre
University of Reading

Citations of this work

The Epistemic Aims of Democracy.Robert Weston Siscoe - 2023 - Philosophy Compass 18 (11):e12941.
Introduction: Myths of Plato, myths of modernity.Tae-Yeoun Keum - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references