Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (3):335-354 (2008)

Authors
Joop Leo
Utrecht University
Abstract
Argument-places play an important role in our dealing with relations. However, that does not mean that argument-places should be taken as primitive entities. It is possible to give an account of relations in which argument-places play no role. But if argument-places are not basic, then what can we say about their identity? Can they, for example, be reconstructed in set theory with appropriate urelements? In this article, we show that for some relations, argument-places cannot be modeled in a neutral way in V[A], the cumulative hierarchy with basic ingredients of the relation as urelements. We argue that a natural way to conceive of argument-places is to identify them with abstract, structureless points of a derivative structure exemplified by positional frames. In case the relation has symmetry, these points may be indiscernible
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s1755020308080222
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology.Stewart Shapiro - 1997 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
The Limits of Abstraction.Kit Fine - 2002 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology.Stewart Shapiro - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (198):120-123.
Neutral Relations.Kit Fine - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (1):1-33.
Structuralism and Metaphysics.Charles Parsons - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):56--77.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Relations.Fraser MacBride - 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Modeling Occurrences of Objects in Relations.Joop Leo - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (1):145-174.
Relational Complexes.Joop Leo - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (2):357-390.
A Tractarian Universe.Albert Visser - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (3):519-545.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-01

Total views
46 ( #246,270 of 2,507,638 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,938 of 2,507,638 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes